Accéder au contenu principal

Win Probability Over Time (Final)

After crunching the number and the data, I came up with nice equations for each score. This allow me to create a table showing the Win probability at every minte for a score differential of -3 to 3. But the two extreme cases are not as accurate as the others. One can check the R² later in the post. So here is the final graph.





























Trailing by 1 Trailing by 2 Trailing by 3 Tie Leading by 1 Leading by 2 Leading by 3
R² = 0,7074 R² = 0,71 R² = 0,1234 R² = 0,2581 R² = 0,9007 R² = 0,8253 R² = 0,2019















So from these I derived the marginal winning chance provided by a goal. I only used the goal differential -2 to 2 because I want to keep the most accurate models. On the graph, T means trailing and l means Leading. So for example the graph T2-->T1 means the winnig probability added by going from a 2 goal deficit to a 1 goal deficit. If my explanations are not clear, the graph will be usefull.



The results are interesting. Tying the game gives the biggest opportunity to take the threee points and increases over time. A late goal is always possible. Reducing the gap between two teams, I mean being down 2 and scoring so the team is down only one, first increases the team Win%. But around half time the effect of this goal is reducing, I guess because time is flying. The inverse phenomena happens when a team takes the lead. I think until now, results are quite normal. This is what you expect.
A last comment is when a team takes a two-goal lead. During first half, this helps increasing a team chance of taking the three points. But after half-time, the effect is slowly reducing. I guess this is not counter-intuitive but the effect is not as huge as I thought. Scoring a second goal when in lead increases the team Win% by around 11,4%. This is just the mean of the values. I don't know what you thin about this, but this looks thin to me. Is the gamble worth the risk? Should a manager go for the break and add a striker or just defend?


I will continue to analyze the recent football results, the next mini-project is to compare the different leads. These models can be used to assess the value of a goal. Thanks to this, one can calculate the Win% added by each goal, and can compare players in terms of AddedWin%. Another mini-project I will undertake.

Commentaires

Posts les plus consultés de ce blog

Goals created and Wins created

Like many others, I have the MCFC data set. I used it to toy with data and created two new statistics. In fact three, I'll explain later. The main thing I tried to do is to assess the impact of a player on the season in terms of scoring opportunities and wins. So first of all, I did some computation, and selected the data I needed:  - Appearances  - Assists  - Big Chances  - Goals  - Key Passes  - Time Played  - Shots I have to say that I'm not too happy with the data set. Many events are not recorded with a name, so you have data that cannot be used when you look at player production. But I managed to do what I wanted with the data. All data are from the MCFC data set, I rely on them for accuracy. First thing I looked at: topscorers. Rank Player full name Goals 1 Robin van Persie 30 2 Wayne Rooney 27 3 Sergio Agüero 23 4 Clint
Win Probability Over Time It is often said that in football a two-goal lead will always yield a victory. But is that really true, and if yes to what extent? Well, this is the aim of my study, thanks to seven seasons of data. What we will basically do is analyze every possible situation, from trailing by 6 to leading by 6. Of course the timing will play a huge role. Because my data set is relatively small, I decided to regroup every result in 5 minutes brackets. Then this will give us the possibility to know the value of a goal in terms of winning chance. Of course in football there is the possibility of a draw so I will have two curves for each game situation. The first one with winning and draw percentage and the second with the simple formula: This will give us a good idea on a team chance of securing the three points. So with this second graph, a basic trend curve will allow us to calculate the Winning% at every point

One-goal and two-goals lead analysis

Continuing on my football resultss analysis, I want to analyze 1-goal and 2-goals lead. The main question is : does every score yields the same winning chance? Of course we keep scores with the same differential, for example home team is one goal up. So I ploted on the same graph the Win% for 1-0, 2-1 and 3-2. First thing you will see in the graph below is that 2-1 data starts at the 15th minute and the 3-2 data starts at the 45th minute. All data points are regrouped in 5-minutes window to correct for the sample size. What you see is that basically, Win% increases over time. But something more interesting is the trend. It seems that when the score is 2-1, the home team has less of winning (or to draw, as I count a draw as half a win). The difference is slighlty over 5%. When the score is 3-2, the curve is also below the 1-0 curve for most points. When building nice fitting curve for 1-0 and 2-1, the trebd is clearer. Even if the effect is not huge, it is interesting to no