Win Probability Over Time
It is often
said that in football a two-goal lead will always yield a victory. But is that
really true, and if yes to what extent? Well, this is the aim of my study,
thanks to seven seasons of data.
What we
will basically do is analyze every possible situation, from trailing by 6 to
leading by 6. Of course the timing will play a huge role. Because my data set
is relatively small, I decided to regroup every result in 5 minutes brackets.
Then this will give us the possibility to know the value of a goal in terms of
winning chance. Of course in football there is the possibility of a draw so I
will have two curves for each game situation. The first one with winning and
draw percentage and the second with the simple formula:
This will
give us a good idea on a team chance of securing the three points. So with this
second graph, a basic trend curve will allow us to calculate the Winning% at every point of a game. Using
the set of equations given by all the possible outcome, we will determine the MarginalWinning%. This means the added
amount of winning percentage given by a goal scored.
Let us
start our journey.
First part : Home team is trailing by 1
I’m a fan
of Liverpool, I admit it and I don’t like the idea of losing. So whenever the
away team scores first at Anfield, my mouth is full of insults for the player
who scored or the damn referee who stole us! But my head is still active even
after a few pints, and says something like, don’t worry Suarez is on the pitch.
If he doesn’t dive he’ll sure score twice. In fact he does score on a generous
penalty. But after 90 minutes of a poor football, my team loses. But then
everybody says that they were close to win this game. Me, statistics enthusiast, I want to know by
how much we missed the comeback.
Well over
the 7 seasons of data I gathered, 4 from French Ligue 1 and 3 from English
Premier League, there is 1428 cases of team trailing by 1. Keep in mind that in
a 3-2 game, two occurrences can appear. If the score line goes like : 0-1, 1-1,
1-2, 2-2, 3-2 there will be two times the home team was trailing. Obviously
these events happened at two different points of the game, so different minutes
and odds. So again, data are in 5 minutes brackets, to have nicer curves and
correct for the lack of data. The winning chance and draw chances can be found
on the next graph.
The trend
for winning is really clear, and obvious. As time flies, chances of winning are
reducing. We can spot an odd point, for [16-20] minutes brackets. At first I
thought maybe I made a mistake while constructing the graph, but I double
checked and still I couldn’t explain this. So I took a look at the data and
what a surprise! Of the 105 games that fit the conditions only 5 managed to
win. 27 came home with one point and the other 73 lost. So for the moment I
have no explanation on this sudden drop. Maybe a psychological effect, but how
can one explain that a team would have more chance of winning at the minute 21
rather than 19? Well as I have no reasonable explanation, I can only make
hypothesis. My assumption is that the manager is aware of this drop, around
half of the first half of the game, so a quarter. As the manager knows that, he
might give some instructions to change tactics or something. This could explain the peak for the next
bracket of time. Also the same phenomena appears around the eightieth minute.
This is the money time, as referred in many American sports. I need to dig into
that and if the odd point still appears in other conditions.
An
interesting thing to note is the almost constant value around half time.
Fatigue could explain this, and the fact that there is an observation round at
the start of each half. My guess is a 5 to 10 minutes window.
As for
draw, the trend is also a reducing percentage as time goes by. The curve is not
really nice, but still betwenn 15% and 30% almost all the time.
Now if we
look at the Winning%.
The trend is once again clear, and we still
have the odd 20 minute point. One might call it the twentieth minute dilemma. Should the manager try to do
something or leave this to luck?.
The curve is not quite fitting the data, R² is
only about 0.70 but it will be useful for further analysis.
I know these kinds of analysis already exist
throughout the web, but it’s a good starting point to build my own statistics.
It’s also a good way to test your model against others. Still, I think this is
a good base to be able to put a number on a goal. It helps us compare Van
Persie to a less prolific striker. But that’s another story I hope to tell you
about later.
So I
guess that’s it for this first short analysis. Feel free to ask any question,
comments… As I’m not at an advanced
level of English I apologize for all the mistakes. I also want to point out
that as an undergraduate student I don’t have access to high level tool I saw
on some articles. To finish, I want to say that my Excel skills are slightly
above average, but I don’t anything about VBA, so don’t expect fancy things. I
hope to be back soon.
Commentaires
Enregistrer un commentaire